Hi list,
I was trying different ways to implement a moving average (count based, not time based). The blunt instrument approach is to create a custom FlatMapFunction that keeps track of the last N values. It seemed like using an AggregateFunction would be most consistent with the Flink API, along the lines of... .keyBy(new MyKeySelector()) .window(GlobalWindows.create()) .trigger(CountTrigger.of(1)) .aggregate(new MovingAverageAggregator(10)) This works, but the API for the AggregateFunction (MovingAverageAggregator) feels a bit odd. Specifically, I want to emit a <key, moving average> result from getResult(), but the key isn’t passed to the createAccumulator() method, nor is it passed to the getResult() method. So in the add() method I check if the accumulator I’ve created has a key set, and if not then I extract the key from the record and set it on the accumulator, so I can use it in the getResult() call. Is this expected, or am I miss-using the functionality? Thanks, — Ken -------------------------- Ken Krugler custom big data solutions & training Flink, Solr, Hadoop, Cascading & Cassandra |
Hi,
I have two possible options to achieve this. The first option is that you could obviously always derive the key again from the input of the aggregate function. The second option is combining an AggregateFunction with a ProcessWindowFunction. With the second solution you get incremental aggregation and the ProcessWindowFunction is only called once in the end with the result. Best, Stefan
|
In reply to this post by Ken Krugler
Hi Ken, You can also use an additional ProcessWindowFunction [1] that is applied on the result of the AggregateFunction to set the key.Since the PWF is only applied on the final result, there no overhead (actually, it might even be slightly cheaper because the AggregateFunction can be simpler). If you don't want to use a PWF, your approach is the right one. [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.4/dev/stream/operators/windows.html#processwindowfunction-with-incremental-aggregation 2018-05-03 19:53 GMT+02:00 Ken Krugler <[hidden email]>:
|
Hi Fabian & Stefan,
Thanks, and yes that does work more like what I’d expect. Regards, — Ken PS - Just FYI the Java code examples in the documentation referenced below have a number of bugs, see FLINK-9299.
|
Hi Ken, FabianThanks for the bug report! 2018-05-05 0:46 GMT+02:00 Ken Krugler <[hidden email]>:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |