Inconsistent documentation of Table Conditional functions

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Inconsistent documentation of Table Conditional functions

Flavio Pompermaier
Hi to all,
in the documentation of the Table Conditional functions [1] the example is inconsistent with the related description (there's no resultX for example). Or am I wrong?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Inconsistent documentation of Table Conditional functions

Rong Rong
Hi Flavio,

I believe the documentation meant "X" as a placeholder, where you can convert "X" into the numeric values (1, 2, ...) depends on how many "CASE WHEN" conditions you have.
"resultZ" is the default result in the "ELSE" statement, and thus it is a literal.

Thanks,
Rong

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,
in the documentation of the Table Conditional functions [1] the example is inconsistent with the related description (there's no resultX for example). Or am I wrong?

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Inconsistent documentation of Table Conditional functions

Xingcan Cui
In reply to this post by Flavio Pompermaier
Hi Flavio,

In the description, resultX is just an identifier for the result of the first meeting condition.

Best,
Xingcan

On May 8, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi to all,
in the documentation of the Table Conditional functions [1] the example is inconsistent with the related description (there's no resultX for example). Or am I wrong?


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Inconsistent documentation of Table Conditional functions

Flavio Pompermaier
Ok, thanks a lot for the clarification! Adding an "Example" on the right of "Description" would be very helpful (IMHO)

Best,
Flavio

On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 6:19 PM Xingcan Cui <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Flavio,

In the description, resultX is just an identifier for the result of the first meeting condition.

Best,
Xingcan

On May 8, 2019, at 12:02 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi to all,
in the documentation of the Table Conditional functions [1] the example is inconsistent with the related description (there's no resultX for example). Or am I wrong?