Posted by
Aljoscha Krettek on
URL: http://deprecated-apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.369.s1.nabble.com/Using-retained-checkpoints-as-savepoints-tp32478p32867.html
Hi,
the reason why we are quite conservative when it comes to stating
properties of checkpoints is that we don't want to prevent ourselves
from implementing possibly optimized checkpoint formats that would not
support these features.
You're right that currently checkpoints support most of the features of
savepoints because they did not diverge far in their formats (or not at
all).
AFAIK, this is not written down anywhere so it would be good to discuss
if we want to give those guarantees (which ties our hands a bit more) or
keep it as is but properly document it.
Best,
Aljoscha
On 30.01.20 01:58, Ken Krugler wrote: