http://deprecated-apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.369.s1.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Flink-1-6-features-tp20502p20770.html
Agree, two missing pieces I think could make Flink more competitive against Spark SQL/Stream and Kafka Stream
1. Flink over Hive or Flink SQL hive table source and sink
2. Flink ML on stream
> On Jun 17, 2018, at 8:34 AM, zhangminglei <
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> Actually, I have been an idea, how about support hive on flink ? Since lots of business are written by hive sql. And users wants to transform map reduce to fink without changing the sql.
>
> Zhangminglei
>
>
>
>> 在 2018年6月17日，下午8:11，zhangminglei <
[hidden email]> 写道：
>>
>> Hi, Sagar
>>
>> There already has relative JIRAs for ORC and Parquet, you can take a look here:
>>
>>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9407 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9407> and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9411 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9411>
>>
>> For ORC format, Currently only support basic data types, such as Long, Boolean, Short, Integer, Float, Double, String.
>>
>> Best
>> Zhangminglei
>>
>>
>>
>>> 在 2018年6月17日，上午11:11，sagar loke <
[hidden email]> 写道：
>>>
>>> We are eagerly waiting for
>>>
>>> - Extends Streaming Sinks:
>>> - Bucketing Sink should support S3 properly (compensate for eventual consistency), work with Flink's shaded S3 file systems, and efficiently support formats that compress/index arcoss individual rows (Parquet, ORC, ...)
>>>
>>> Especially for ORC and Parquet sinks. Since, We are planning to use Kafka-jdbc to move data from rdbms to hdfs.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 5:08 PM Elias Levy <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> One more, since it we have to deal with it often:
>>>
>>> - Idling sources (Kafka in particular) and proper watermark propagation: FLINK-5018 / FLINK-5479
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Elias Levy <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> Since wishes are free:
>>>
>>> - Standalone cluster job isolation:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8886 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8886>
>>> - Proper sliding window joins (not overlapping hoping window joins):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6243 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6243>
>>> - Sharing state across operators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6239 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6239>
>>> - Synchronizing streams:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4558 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4558>
>>>
>>> Seconded:
>>> - Atomic cancel-with-savepoint:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7634 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7634>
>>> - Support dynamically changing CEP patterns :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7129 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7129>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 1:31 PM, Stephan Ewen <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> Thanks for the discussion and good input. Many suggestions fit well with the proposal above.
>>>
>>> Please bear in mind that with a time-based release model, we would release whatever is mature by end of July.
>>> The good thing is we could schedule the next release not too far after that, so that the features that did not quite make it will not be delayed too long.
>>> In some sense, you could read this as as "what to do first" list, rather than "this goes in, other things stay out".
>>>
>>> Some thoughts on some of the suggestions
>>>
>>> Kubernetes integration: An opaque integration with Kubernetes should be supported through the "as a library" mode. For a deeper integration, I know that some committers have experimented with some PoC code. I would let Till add some thoughts, he has worked the most on the deployment parts recently.
>>>
>>> Per partition watermarks with idleness: Good point, could one implement that on the current interface, with a periodic watermark extractor?
>>>
>>> Atomic cancel-with-savepoint: Agreed, this is important. Making this work with all sources needs a bit more work. We should have this in the roadmap.
>>>
>>> Elastic Bloomfilters: This seems like an interesting new feature - the above suggested feature set was more about addressing some longer standing issues/requests. However, nothing should prevent contributors to work on that.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Stephan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 6:23 AM, Yan Zhou [FDS Science] <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>> +1 on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479>
>>> [FLINK-5479] Per-partition watermarks in ... <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479>
>>> issues.apache.org <
http://issues.apache.org/>
>>> Reported in ML:
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Kafka-topic-partition-skewness-causes-watermark-not-being-emitted-td11008.html <
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Kafka-topic-partition-skewness-causes-watermark-not-being-emitted-td11008.html> It's normally not a common case to have Kafka partitions not producing any data, but it'll probably be good to handle this as well. I ...
>>>
>>> From: Rico Bergmann <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 9:12:00 PM
>>> To: Hao Sun
>>> Cc:
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>; user
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Flink 1.6 features
>>>
>>> +1 on K8s integration
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 06.06.2018 um 00:01 schrieb Hao Sun <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>>:
>>>
>>>> adding my vote to K8S Job mode, maybe it is this?
>>>>> Smoothen the integration in Container environment, like "Flink as a Library", and easier integration with Kubernetes services and other proxies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 11:01 PM Ben Yan <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>>> Hi Stephan,
>>>>
>>>> Will [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479 <
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5479> ] (Per-partition watermarks in FlinkKafkaConsumer should consider idle partitions) be included in 1.6? As we are seeing more users with this issue on the mailing lists.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> Ben
>>>>
>>>> 2018-06-05 5:29 GMT+08:00 Che Lui Shum <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>>:
>>>> Hi Stephan,
>>>>
>>>> Will FLINK-7129 (Support dynamically changing CEP patterns) be included in 1.6? There were discussions about possibly including it in 1.6:
>>>>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-user/201803.mbox/%3cCAMq=OU7gru2O9JtoWXn1Lc1F7NKcxAyN6A3e58kxctb4b508RQ@...%3e <
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/flink-user/201803.mbox/%3cCAMq=OU7gru2O9JtoWXn1Lc1F7NKcxAyN6A3e58kxctb4b508RQ@...%3e>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shirley Shum
>>>>
>>>> Stephan Ewen ---06/04/2018 02:21:47 AM---Hi Flink Community! The release of Apache Flink 1.5 has happened (yay!) - so it is a good time
>>>>
>>>> From: Stephan Ewen <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>>
>>>> To:
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>, user <
[hidden email] <mailto:
[hidden email]>>
>>>> Date: 06/04/2018 02:21 AM
>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Flink 1.6 features
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Flink Community!
>>>>
>>>> The release of Apache Flink 1.5 has happened (yay!) - so it is a good time to start talking about what to do for release 1.6.
>>>>
>>>> == Suggested release timeline ==
>>>>
>>>> I would propose to release around end of July (that is 8-9 weeks from now).
>>>>
>>>> The rational behind that: There was a lot of effort in release testing automation (end-to-end tests, scripted stress tests) as part of release 1.5. You may have noticed the big set of new modules under "flink-end-to-end-tests" in the Flink repository. It delayed the 1.5 release a bit, and needs to continue as part of the coming release cycle, but should help make releasing more lightweight from now on.
>>>>
>>>> (Side note: There are also some nightly stress tests that we created and run at data Artisans, and where we are looking whether and in which way it would make sense to contribute them to Flink.)
>>>>
>>>> == Features and focus areas ==
>>>>
>>>> We had a lot of big and heavy features in Flink 1.5, with FLIP-6, the new network stack, recovery, SQL joins and client, ... Following something like a "tick-tock-model", I would suggest to focus the next release more on integrations, tooling, and reducing user friction.
>>>>
>>>> Of course, this does not mean that no other pull request gets reviewed, an no other topic will be examined - it is simply meant as a help to understand where to expect more activity during the next release cycle. Note that these are really the coarse focus areas - don't read this as a comprehensive list.
>>>>
>>>> This list is my first suggestion, based on discussions with committers, users, and mailing list questions.
>>>>
>>>> - Support Java 9 and Scala 2.12
>>>>
>>>> - Smoothen the integration in Container environment, like "Flink as a Library", and easier integration with Kubernetes services and other proxies.
>>>>
>>>> - Polish the remaing parts of the FLIP-6 rewrite
>>>>
>>>> - Improve state backends with asynchronous timer snapshots, efficient timer deletes, state TTL, and broadcast state support in RocksDB.
>>>>
>>>> - Extends Streaming Sinks:
>>>> - Bucketing Sink should support S3 properly (compensate for eventual consistency), work with Flink's shaded S3 file systems, and efficiently support formats that compress/index arcoss individual rows (Parquet, ORC, ...)
>>>> - Support ElasticSearch's new REST API
>>>>
>>>> - Smoothen State Evolution to support type conversion on snapshot restore
>>>>
>>>> - Enhance Stream SQL and CEP
>>>> - Add support for "update by key" Table Sources
>>>> - Add more table sources and sinks (Kafka, Kinesis, Files, K/V stores)
>>>> - Expand SQL client
>>>> - Integrate CEP and SQL, through MATCH_RECOGNIZE clause
>>>> - Improve CEP Performance of SharedBuffer on RocksDB
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Sagar
>>
>
>