> Hi Stephan,
>
> do you know an easy way to find out if Kryo or POJO is used? I have an
> Object that would be a POJO, but it has one field that uses an object
> without a public no argument constructor. As I understood the
> documentation, this should result in Kryo being used.
>
> Thanks,
> Jürgen
>
> On 03.07.2017 17:18, Stephan Ewen wrote:
>> Hi Urs!
>>
>> Inside Flink (between Flink operators)
>> - Kryo is not a problem, but types must be registered up front for
>> good performance
>> - Tuples and POJOs are often faster than the types that fall back to
>> Kryo
>>
>> Persistent-storage (HDFS, Kafka, ...)
>> - Kryo is not recommended, because its binary data format is not
>> stable. It changes between major Kryo versions and between Kryo setups
>> with different type registrations.
>> - A stable format with schema evolution support (Avro, Thrift, ...)
>> is recommended here.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Urs Schoenenberger
>> <
[hidden email]
>> <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> do you have a link where I could read up on the rationale behind
>> avoiding Kryo? I'm currently facing a similar decision and would
>> like to
>> get some more background on this.
>>
>> Thank you very much,
>> Urs
>>
>> On 21.06.2017 12:10, Greg Hogan wrote:
>> > The recommendation has been to avoid Kryo where possible.
>> >
>> > General data exchange: avro or thrift.
>> >
>> > Flink internal data exchange: POJO (or Tuple, which are slightly
>> faster though less readable, and there is an outstanding PR to
>> narrow or close the performance gap).
>> >
>> > Kryo is useful for types which cannot be modified to be a POJO.
>> There are also cases where Kryo must be used because Flink has
>> insufficient TypeInformation, such as when returning an interface
>> or abstract type when the actual concrete type can be known.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On Jun 21, 2017, at 3:19 AM, nragon
>> <
[hidden email]
>> <mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So, serialization between producer application -> kafka ->
>> flink kafka
>> >> consumer will use avro, thrift or kryo right? From there, the
>> remaining
>> >> pipeline can just use standard pojo serialization, which would
>> be better?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>>
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Kafka-and-Flink-integration-tp13792p13885.html>> <
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Kafka-and-Flink-integration-tp13792p13885.html>
>> >> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing
>> list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Urs Schönenberger -
[hidden email]
>> <mailto:
[hidden email]>
>>
>> TNG Technology Consulting GmbH, Betastr. 13a, 85774 Unterföhring
>> Geschäftsführer: Henrik Klagges, Christoph Stock, Dr. Robert Dahlke
>> Sitz: Unterföhring * Amtsgericht München * HRB 135082
>>
>>
>
> --
> Jürgen Thomann
> System Administrator
>
>
> InnoGames GmbH
> Friesenstraße 13 - 20097 Hamburg - Germany
> Tel +49 40 7889335-0
>
> Managing Directors: Hendrik Klindworth, Michael Zillmer
> VAT-ID: DE264068907 Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 108973
>
>
http://www.innogames.com –
[hidden email]
>