Hello, In a setup where we allocate most of the memory to rocksdb (off-heap) we ha= ve an important cutoff. Our issue is that the same cutoff applies to both task and job managers : the heap size of the job manager then becomes too low. Is there a way to apply different cutoffs to job and task managers ? Regards, |
Hi Gwenhael, I'm afraid that we could not set different cut-off to jobmanager and taskmanager. You could set the jvm args manually to work around. For example, 'env.java.opts.jobmanager=-Xms3072m -Xmx3072m'. In most jvm implementation, the rightmost Xmx Xms will take effect. So i think it should work. Please have a try. Best, Yang Gwenhael Pasquiers <[hidden email]> 于2019年11月19日周二 下午10:56写道:
|
I see, good idea, I’ll try that and tell you the result. Thanks, From: Yang Wang <[hidden email]> Hi Gwenhael, I'm afraid that we could not set different cut-off to jobmanager and taskmanager. You could set the jvm args manually to work around. For example, 'env.java.opts.jobmanager=-Xms3072m -Xmx3072m'. In most jvm implementation, the rightmost Xmx Xms will take effect. So i think it should work. Please have a try. Best, Yang Gwenhael Pasquiers <[hidden email]>
于2019年11月19日周二
下午10:56写道:
|
In reply to this post by Yang Wang
This works; I had some issues modifying my scripts, but it’s OK and I could confirm by JMX that env.java.opts.jobmanager had priority over the “normal” heap size (calculated from cutoff). Thanks !
😊 From: Yang Wang <[hidden email]> Hi Gwenhael, I'm afraid that we could not set different cut-off to jobmanager and taskmanager. You could set the jvm args manually to work around. For example, 'env.java.opts.jobmanager=-Xms3072m -Xmx3072m'. In most jvm implementation, the rightmost Xmx Xms will take effect. So i think it should work. Please have a try. Best, Yang Gwenhael Pasquiers <[hidden email]>
于2019年11月19日周二
下午10:56写道:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |