Hi,
I want to write the result of a batch process into a file. I want that the result is written on a specific machine. For example, I have 4 machines (m1.example.com, m2.example.com, m3.example.com, m4.example.com). Now, I want that the results go to m1 and that m1 writes the result in a file in its local filesystem. Does anyone knows how I can do that? Best Regards, Hilmi -- -- Hilmi Yildirim Software Developer R&D http://www.neofonie.de Besuchen Sie den Neo Tech Blog für Anwender: http://blog.neofonie.de/ Folgen Sie uns: https://plus.google.com/+neofonie http://www.linkedin.com/company/neofonie-gmbh https://www.xing.com/companies/neofoniegmbh Neofonie GmbH | Robert-Koch-Platz 4 | 10115 Berlin Handelsregister Berlin-Charlottenburg: HRB 67460 Geschäftsführung: Thomas Kitlitschko |
Hi Hilmi, in Flink you cannot control on which machines the individual tasks are scheduled. Therefore, you cannot control on which machine the data is written. However, you can control that only on one machine a file is created by setting the degree of parallelism of the Cheers, On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Hilmi Yildirim <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi, |
Hi Till,
thank you very much. BR, Hilmi Am 22.05.2015 um 16:09 schrieb Till
Rohrmann:
-- -- Hilmi Yildirim Software Developer R&D T: +49 30 24627-281 [hidden email] http://www.neofonie.de Besuchen Sie den Neo Tech Blog für Anwender: http://blog.neofonie.de/ Folgen Sie uns: https://plus.google.com/+neofonie http://www.linkedin.com/company/neofonie-gmbh https://www.xing.com/companies/neofoniegmbh Neofonie GmbH | Robert-Koch-Platz 4 | 10115 Berlin Handelsregister Berlin-Charlottenburg: HRB 67460 Geschäftsführung: Thomas Kitlitschko |
A work around might be to set the parallelism to 1 as Till suggested and write into a network-shared directory. Nonetheless, it sounds like a good feature to support strict assignments of data sink tasks to machines.2015-05-22 16:10 GMT+02:00 Hilmi Yildirim <[hidden email]>:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |