Hello team,
I’m developing a system where we are trying to sink to an immutable s3 bucket. This bucket has server side encryption set as KMS. The DataStream sink works perfectly fine when I don’t use the immutable bucket but when I use an immutable bucket, I get exceptions regarding multipart upload failures. It says we need to enable md5 hashing for the put object to work. Here’s the stack trace: org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.AsynchronousException: Caught exception while processing timer. at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$StreamTaskAsyncExceptionHandler.handleAsyncException(StreamTask.java:1090) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.handleAsyncException(StreamTask.java:1058) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invokeProcessingTimeCallback(StreamTask.java:1520) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.lambda$null$10(StreamTask.java:1509) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTaskActionExecutor$SynchronizedStreamTaskActionExecutor.run(StreamTaskActionExecutor.java:87) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.Mail.run(Mail.java:78) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.MailboxProcessor.processMail(MailboxProcessor.java:261) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.MailboxProcessor.runMailboxLoop(MailboxProcessor.java:186) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.runMailboxLoop(StreamTask.java:487) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:470) at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.doRun(Task.java:707) at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:532) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834) Caused by: org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.TimerException: java.io.IOException: Uploading parts failed ... 11 common frames omitted Caused by: java.io.IOException: Uploading parts failed at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.awaitPendingPartUploadToComplete(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:231) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.awaitPendingPartsUpload(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:215) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.snapshotAndGetRecoverable(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:151) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.snapshotAndGetCommitter(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:123) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.snapshotAndGetCommitter(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:56) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.S3RecoverableFsDataOutputStream.closeForCommit(S3RecoverableFsDataOutputStream.java:167) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.PartFileWriter.closeForCommit(PartFileWriter.java:71) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.Bucket.closePartFile(Bucket.java:239) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.Bucket.onProcessingTime(Bucket.java:338) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.Buckets.onProcessingTime(Buckets.java:304) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.StreamingFileSink.onProcessingTime(StreamingFileSink.java:439) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invokeProcessingTimeCallback(StreamTask.java:1518) ... 10 common frames omitted Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.AWSBadRequestException: upload part on raw_events/xxx/xxx/2020/07/15/20/archived-2-0.txt: com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception: Content-MD5 HTTP header is required for Put Part requests with Object Lock parameters (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidRequest; Request ID: xxx; S3 Extended Request ID: xxxx), S3 Extended Request ID: xxxxxx :InvalidRequest: Content-MD5 HTTP header is required for Put Part requests with Object Lock parameters (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidRequest; Request ID: xxxx; S3 Extended Request ID: xxxx) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AUtils.translateException(S3AUtils.java:212) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:111) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.lambda$retry$3(Invoker.java:260) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retryUntranslated(Invoker.java:317) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:256) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:231) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.retry(WriteOperationHelper.java:123) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.uploadPart(WriteOperationHelper.java:471) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3hadoop.HadoopS3AccessHelper.uploadPart(HadoopS3AccessHelper.java:73) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl$UploadTask.run(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:318) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.utils.BackPressuringExecutor$SemaphoreReleasingRunnable.run(BackPressuringExecutor.java:92) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) ... 1 common frames omitted Caused by: com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception: Content-MD5 HTTP header is required for Put Part requests with Object Lock parameters (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidRequest; Request ID: xxxxx; S3 Extended Request ID: xxxx) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.handleErrorResponse(AmazonHttpClient.java:1639) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeOneRequest(AmazonHttpClient.java:1304) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeHelper(AmazonHttpClient.java:1056) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.doExecute(AmazonHttpClient.java:743) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeWithTimer(AmazonHttpClient.java:717) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:699) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.access$500(AmazonHttpClient.java:667) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutionBuilderImpl.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:649) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:513) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4325) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4272) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.doUploadPart(AmazonS3Client.java:3306) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.uploadPart(AmazonS3Client.java:3291) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem.uploadPart(S3AFileSystem.java:1576) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.lambda$uploadPart$8(WriteOperationHelper.java:474) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:109) ... 12 common frames omitted My questions are: 1. Is this md5 hashing a mandatory rule to support this? The first part of the file always gets uploaded to s3 but next part onward, it fails. According to was s3 documentation for immutable buckets (with object locks) they say it’s mandatory - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_PutObject.html “The Content-MD5 header is required for any request to upload an object with a retention period configured using Amazon S3 Object Lock. For more information about Amazon S3 Object Lock, see Amazon S3 Object Lock Overview in the Amazon Simple Storage Service Developer Guide."2. If it’s mandatory, how do I set this HTTP header while sinking? I checked most of the documentation and tried going through the source code too but couldn’t really find a provision where we could set the headers for a request that goes in as a sink. |
Please try configuring :
fs.s3a.etag.checksum.enabled: true On 16/07/2020 03:11, nikita
Balakrishnan wrote:
Hello team, I’m developing a system where we are trying to sink to an immutable s3 bucket. This bucket has server side encryption set as KMS. The DataStream sink works perfectly fine when I don’t use the immutable bucket but when I use an immutable bucket, I get exceptions regarding multipart upload failures. It says we need to enable md5 hashing for the put object to work. Here’s the stack trace: org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.AsynchronousException: Caught exception while processing timer. at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$StreamTaskAsyncExceptionHandler.handleAsyncException(StreamTask.java:1090) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.handleAsyncException(StreamTask.java:1058) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invokeProcessingTimeCallback(StreamTask.java:1520) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.lambda$null$10(StreamTask.java:1509) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTaskActionExecutor$SynchronizedStreamTaskActionExecutor.run(StreamTaskActionExecutor.java:87) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.Mail.run(Mail.java:78) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.MailboxProcessor.processMail(MailboxProcessor.java:261) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.mailbox.MailboxProcessor.runMailboxLoop(MailboxProcessor.java:186) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.runMailboxLoop(StreamTask.java:487) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:470) at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.doRun(Task.java:707) at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:532) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834) Caused by: org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.TimerException: java.io.IOException: Uploading parts failed ... 11 common frames omitted Caused by: java.io.IOException: Uploading parts failed at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.awaitPendingPartUploadToComplete(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:231) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.awaitPendingPartsUpload(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:215) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.snapshotAndGetRecoverable(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:151) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.snapshotAndGetCommitter(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:123) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.snapshotAndGetCommitter(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:56) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.S3RecoverableFsDataOutputStream.closeForCommit(S3RecoverableFsDataOutputStream.java:167) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.PartFileWriter.closeForCommit(PartFileWriter.java:71) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.Bucket.closePartFile(Bucket.java:239) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.Bucket.onProcessingTime(Bucket.java:338) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.Buckets.onProcessingTime(Buckets.java:304) at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.functions.sink.filesystem.StreamingFileSink.onProcessingTime(StreamingFileSink.java:439) at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invokeProcessingTimeCallback(StreamTask.java:1518) ... 10 common frames omitted Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.AWSBadRequestException: upload part on raw_events/xxx/xxx/2020/07/15/20/archived-2-0.txt: com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception: Content-MD5 HTTP header is required for Put Part requests with Object Lock parameters (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidRequest; Request ID: xxx; S3 Extended Request ID: xxxx), S3 Extended Request ID: xxxxxx :InvalidRequest: Content-MD5 HTTP header is required for Put Part requests with Object Lock parameters (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidRequest; Request ID: xxxx; S3 Extended Request ID: xxxx) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AUtils.translateException(S3AUtils.java:212) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:111) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.lambda$retry$3(Invoker.java:260) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retryUntranslated(Invoker.java:317) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:256) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.retry(Invoker.java:231) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.retry(WriteOperationHelper.java:123) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.uploadPart(WriteOperationHelper.java:471) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3hadoop.HadoopS3AccessHelper.uploadPart(HadoopS3AccessHelper.java:73) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.writer.RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl$UploadTask.run(RecoverableMultiPartUploadImpl.java:318) at org.apache.flink.fs.s3.common.utils.BackPressuringExecutor$SemaphoreReleasingRunnable.run(BackPressuringExecutor.java:92) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128) at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628) ... 1 common frames omitted Caused by: com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.AmazonS3Exception: Content-MD5 HTTP header is required for Put Part requests with Object Lock parameters (Service: Amazon S3; Status Code: 400; Error Code: InvalidRequest; Request ID: xxxxx; S3 Extended Request ID: xxxx) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.handleErrorResponse(AmazonHttpClient.java:1639) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeOneRequest(AmazonHttpClient.java:1304) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeHelper(AmazonHttpClient.java:1056) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.doExecute(AmazonHttpClient.java:743) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.executeWithTimer(AmazonHttpClient.java:717) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:699) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutor.access$500(AmazonHttpClient.java:667) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient$RequestExecutionBuilderImpl.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:649) at com.amazonaws.http.AmazonHttpClient.execute(AmazonHttpClient.java:513) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4325) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.invoke(AmazonS3Client.java:4272) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.doUploadPart(AmazonS3Client.java:3306) at com.amazonaws.services.s3.AmazonS3Client.uploadPart(AmazonS3Client.java:3291) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.S3AFileSystem.uploadPart(S3AFileSystem.java:1576) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.WriteOperationHelper.lambda$uploadPart$8(WriteOperationHelper.java:474) at org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.Invoker.once(Invoker.java:109) ... 12 common frames omitted My questions are: 1. Is this md5 hashing a mandatory rule to support this? The first part of the file always gets uploaded to s3 but next part onward, it fails. According to was s3 documentation for immutable buckets (with object locks) they say it’s mandatory - https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_PutObject.html “The Content-MD5 header is required for any request to upload an object with a retention period configured using Amazon S3 Object Lock. For more information about Amazon S3 Object Lock, see Amazon S3 Object Lock Overview <https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/object-lock-overview.html> in the *Amazon Simple Storage Service Developer Guide*." 2. If it’s mandatory, how do I set this HTTP header while sinking? I checked most of the documentation and tried going through the source code too but couldn’t really find a provision where we could set the headers for a request that goes in as a sink.
|
Hey Chesnay, Thank you for getting back with that! I tried setting that too, it still gives me the same exception. Is there something else that I'm missing? I also have fs.s3a.bucket.<bucket-name>.server-side-encryption-algorithm=SSE-KMS and fs.s3a.bucket.<bucket-name>.server-side-encryption.key set. Is there no need to set the md5 hash value manually while sinking? The fs.s3a.etag.checksum.enabled: true will do it for me? And Do I need to specify anywhere that we have to use md5 hashing? On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:04 AM Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
I only quickly skimmed the Hadoop docs
and found this (although it is not documented very well I might
add). If this does not do the trick, I'd suggest to reach out to
the Hadoop project, since we're using their S3 filesystem.
On 16/07/2020 19:32, nikita
Balakrishnan wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |