Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
7 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Shashwat Rastogi
Hi,

We have several Flink jobs, all of which reads data from Kafka do some aggregations (over sliding windows of (1d, 1h)) and writes data to Cassandra. Something like :

```
DataStream<String> lines = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer010( … ));
DataStream<Event> events = lines.map(line -> parse(line));
DataStream<Statistics> stats = stream
        .keyBy(“id”)
        .timeWindow(1d, 1h)
        .sum(new MyAggregateFunction());
writeToCassandra(stats);
```

We recently made a switch to RocksDbStateBackend, for it’s suitability for large states/long windows. However, after making the switch a memory issues has come up, the memory utilisation on TaskManager gradually increases from 50 GB to ~63GB until the container is killed. We are unable to figure out what is causing this behaviour, is there some memory leak on the RocksDB ?

How much memory should we allocate to the Flink TaskManager? Since, RocksDB is a native application and it does not use the JVM how much of the memory should we allocate/leave for RocksDB (out of 64GB of total memory).
Is there a way to set the maximum amount of memory that will be used by RocksDB so that it doesn’t overwhelms the system? Are there some recommended optimal settings for RocksDB for larger states (for 1 day window average state size is 3GB).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Flink v1.2.1.
Thanks in advance.

Best,
Shashwat
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Vinay Patil
Hi Shashwat,

Are you specifying the RocksDBStateBackend from the flink-conf.yaml or from code?

If you are specifying it from the code, you can try using PredefinedOptions.FLASH_SSD_OPTIMIZED
Also, you can try setting incremental checkpointing ( this feature is in Flink 1.3.0)

If the above does not solve your issue, you can control the memory usage of RocksDB by tuning the following values and check your performance :

DBOptions: 
     (along with the FLASH_SSD_OPTIONS add the following)
     maxBackgroundCompactions(4)
    
ColumnFamilyOptions:
  max_buffer_size : 512 MB
  block_cache_size : 128 MB
  max_write_buffer_number : 5
  minimum_buffer_number_to_merge : 2
  cacheIndexAndFilterBlocks : true
  optimizeFilterForHits: true


I would recommend reading the following documents: 



Hope it helps.


Regards,
Vinay Patil

On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Shashwat Rastogi [via Apache Flink User Mailing List archive.] <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

We have several Flink jobs, all of which reads data from Kafka do some aggregations (over sliding windows of (1d, 1h)) and writes data to Cassandra. Something like :

```
DataStream<String> lines = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer010( … ));
DataStream<Event> events = lines.map(line -> parse(line));
DataStream<Statistics> stats = stream
        .keyBy(“id”)
        .timeWindow(1d, 1h)
        .sum(new MyAggregateFunction());
writeToCassandra(stats);
```

We recently made a switch to RocksDbStateBackend, for it’s suitability for large states/long windows. However, after making the switch a memory issues has come up, the memory utilisation on TaskManager gradually increases from 50 GB to ~63GB until the container is killed. We are unable to figure out what is causing this behaviour, is there some memory leak on the RocksDB ?

How much memory should we allocate to the Flink TaskManager? Since, RocksDB is a native application and it does not use the JVM how much of the memory should we allocate/leave for RocksDB (out of 64GB of total memory).
Is there a way to set the maximum amount of memory that will be used by RocksDB so that it doesn’t overwhelms the system? Are there some recommended optimal settings for RocksDB for larger states (for 1 day window average state size is 3GB).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Flink v1.2.1.
Thanks in advance.

Best,
Shashwat


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Memory-Leak-Flink-RocksDB-tp14439.html
To start a new topic under Apache Flink User Mailing List archive., email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from Apache Flink User Mailing List archive., click here.
NAML

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Kien Truong
In reply to this post by Shashwat Rastogi
Hi,

What're your task manager memory configuration ? Can you post the
TaskManager's log ?

Regards,

Kien


On 7/25/2017 8:41 PM, Shashwat Rastogi wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We have several Flink jobs, all of which reads data from Kafka do some aggregations (over sliding windows of (1d, 1h)) and writes data to Cassandra. Something like :
>
> ```
> DataStream<String> lines = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer010( … ));
> DataStream<Event> events = lines.map(line -> parse(line));
> DataStream<Statistics> stats = stream
> .keyBy(“id”)
> .timeWindow(1d, 1h)
> .sum(new MyAggregateFunction());
> writeToCassandra(stats);
> ```
>
> We recently made a switch to RocksDbStateBackend, for it’s suitability for large states/long windows. However, after making the switch a memory issues has come up, the memory utilisation on TaskManager gradually increases from 50 GB to ~63GB until the container is killed. We are unable to figure out what is causing this behaviour, is there some memory leak on the RocksDB ?
>
> How much memory should we allocate to the Flink TaskManager? Since, RocksDB is a native application and it does not use the JVM how much of the memory should we allocate/leave for RocksDB (out of 64GB of total memory).
> Is there a way to set the maximum amount of memory that will be used by RocksDB so that it doesn’t overwhelms the system? Are there some recommended optimal settings for RocksDB for larger states (for 1 day window average state size is 3GB).
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Flink v1.2.1.
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best,
> Shashwat

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Shashwat Rastogi
Hi Vinay,

@Vinay :  I am setting RocksDBStateBackend from the code, not from flink-conf.yaml. 
I am currently trying out the configurations that you have shared. I’ll let you know how they perform. Thank you so much for your help.

However, were you able to figure out what exactly is going wrong with the RocksDb setup? 
And, while making these modifications did you notice any significant drop in RocksDb performance.

Overall, how do you think we should configure memory for the TaskManager? 
Is there a way to estimate how much memory is sufficient for task manager heap and RocksDBStateBackend?

Thank you

Best,
Shashwat


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Shashwat Rastogi
In reply to this post by Kien Truong
Hi Kien,

Sorry it took me sometime to fetch the logs. I am attaching logs of the machine which died due to lack of free memory. 



I have set only
`taskmanager.heap.mb: 35840`
taskmanager.numberOfTaskSlots: 8
And the rest are just default properties in the flink-conf.yaml

Thank you in advance.

Regards
Shashwat

On 26-Jul-2017, at 12:10 PM, Kien Truong <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

What're your task manager memory configuration ? Can you post the TaskManager's log ?

Regards,

Kien


On 7/25/2017 8:41 PM, Shashwat Rastogi wrote:
Hi,

We have several Flink jobs, all of which reads data from Kafka do some aggregations (over sliding windows of (1d, 1h)) and writes data to Cassandra. Something like :

```
DataStream<String> lines = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer010( … ));
DataStream<Event> events = lines.map(line -> parse(line));
DataStream<Statistics> stats = stream
.keyBy(“id”)
.timeWindow(1d, 1h)
.sum(new MyAggregateFunction());
writeToCassandra(stats);
```

We recently made a switch to RocksDbStateBackend, for it’s suitability for large states/long windows. However, after making the switch a memory issues has come up, the memory utilisation on TaskManager gradually increases from 50 GB to ~63GB until the container is killed. We are unable to figure out what is causing this behaviour, is there some memory leak on the RocksDB ?

How much memory should we allocate to the Flink TaskManager? Since, RocksDB is a native application and it does not use the JVM how much of the memory should we allocate/leave for RocksDB (out of 64GB of total memory).
Is there a way to set the maximum amount of memory that will be used by RocksDB so that it doesn’t overwhelms the system? Are there some recommended optimal settings for RocksDB for larger states (for 1 day window average state size is 3GB).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Flink v1.2.1.
Thanks in advance.

Best,
Shashwat



c01-log-1300to1430.txt (79K) Download Attachment
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Kien Truong

Hello,

This is the system log, not the task manager's application log, which is what I was referring to.

If you're using the standalone cluster, then the task manager log should be in the logs directory, inside your Flink's installation

Regards,
Kien

On 7/27/2017 3:49 PM, Shashwat Rastogi wrote:
Hi Kien,

Sorry it took me sometime to fetch the logs. I am attaching logs of the machine which died due to lack of free memory. 




I have set only
`taskmanager.heap.mb: 35840`
taskmanager.numberOfTaskSlots: 8
And the rest are just default properties in the flink-conf.yaml

Thank you in advance.

Regards
Shashwat

On 26-Jul-2017, at 12:10 PM, Kien Truong <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

What're your task manager memory configuration ? Can you post the TaskManager's log ?

Regards,

Kien


On 7/25/2017 8:41 PM, Shashwat Rastogi wrote:
Hi,

We have several Flink jobs, all of which reads data from Kafka do some aggregations (over sliding windows of (1d, 1h)) and writes data to Cassandra. Something like :

```
DataStream<String> lines = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer010( … ));
DataStream<Event> events = lines.map(line -> parse(line));
DataStream<Statistics> stats = stream
.keyBy(“id”)
.timeWindow(1d, 1h)
.sum(new MyAggregateFunction());
writeToCassandra(stats);
```

We recently made a switch to RocksDbStateBackend, for it’s suitability for large states/long windows. However, after making the switch a memory issues has come up, the memory utilisation on TaskManager gradually increases from 50 GB to ~63GB until the container is killed. We are unable to figure out what is causing this behaviour, is there some memory leak on the RocksDB ?

How much memory should we allocate to the Flink TaskManager? Since, RocksDB is a native application and it does not use the JVM how much of the memory should we allocate/leave for RocksDB (out of 64GB of total memory).
Is there a way to set the maximum amount of memory that will be used by RocksDB so that it doesn’t overwhelms the system? Are there some recommended optimal settings for RocksDB for larger states (for 1 day window average state size is 3GB).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Flink v1.2.1.
Thanks in advance.

Best,
Shashwat



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Memory Leak - Flink / RocksDB ?

Stefan Richter
In reply to this post by Shashwat Rastogi
Hi,

I see that matching the RocksDB configuration to fit certain container sizes can be very tedious and error prone for users. I have opened a jira to start improving the situation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7289. Please feel free to comment and share your experiences or ideas, they might be very valuable input.

One consideration, from what you shared I can see that you are using 8 slots per task and a heap size of 35840MB. This means that there are potentially also up to 8 RocksDB instances on one TM. Furthermore, when you are using RocksDB, your heavy state will typically live in RocksDB (native memory) and no longer on the JVM heap. I think it would make a lot of sense to reduce you maximum heap size dramatically, so that more memory from your container budget is available as native memory for RocksDB. I hope this can also help with your problem.

Best,
Stefan

Am 27.07.2017 um 10:49 schrieb Shashwat Rastogi <[hidden email]>:

Hi Kien,

Sorry it took me sometime to fetch the logs. I am attaching logs of the machine which died due to lack of free memory. 

<c01-log-1300to1430.txt>

I have set only
`taskmanager.heap.mb: 35840`
taskmanager.numberOfTaskSlots: 8
And the rest are just default properties in the flink-conf.yaml

Thank you in advance.

Regards
Shashwat

On 26-Jul-2017, at 12:10 PM, Kien Truong <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi,

What're your task manager memory configuration ? Can you post the TaskManager's log ?

Regards,

Kien


On 7/25/2017 8:41 PM, Shashwat Rastogi wrote:
Hi,

We have several Flink jobs, all of which reads data from Kafka do some aggregations (over sliding windows of (1d, 1h)) and writes data to Cassandra. Something like :

```
DataStream<String> lines = env.addSource(new FlinkKafkaConsumer010( … ));
DataStream<Event> events = lines.map(line -> parse(line));
DataStream<Statistics> stats = stream
.keyBy(“id”)
.timeWindow(1d, 1h)
.sum(new MyAggregateFunction());
writeToCassandra(stats);
```

We recently made a switch to RocksDbStateBackend, for it’s suitability for large states/long windows. However, after making the switch a memory issues has come up, the memory utilisation on TaskManager gradually increases from 50 GB to ~63GB until the container is killed. We are unable to figure out what is causing this behaviour, is there some memory leak on the RocksDB ?

How much memory should we allocate to the Flink TaskManager? Since, RocksDB is a native application and it does not use the JVM how much of the memory should we allocate/leave for RocksDB (out of 64GB of total memory).
Is there a way to set the maximum amount of memory that will be used by RocksDB so that it doesn’t overwhelms the system? Are there some recommended optimal settings for RocksDB for larger states (for 1 day window average state size is 3GB).

Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using Flink v1.2.1.
Thanks in advance.

Best,
Shashwat