Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
62 posts
|
Hi,
I wrote to you before about the MatrixMultiplication in Flink … Unfortunately, the multiplication of a pair of 1000 x 1000 matrices is taking already almost a minute. Would you please take a look at my attached code. Maybe you can suggest something to make it faster? Or would it be better to tackle the problem with the Gelly API? (Since the matrix is an adjacency matrix). And if so how would you tackle it? Thanks in advance and best regards, Lydia package de.tuberlin.dima.aim3.assignment3; |
Loading... |
Reply to author |
Edit post |
Move post |
Delete this post |
Delete this post and replies |
Change post date |
Print post |
Permalink |
Raw mail |
1476 posts
|
Hi Lydia, the implementation looks correct. What you could do to speed up the computation is to exploit existing partitionings in order to avoid unnecessary network shuffles. Moreover, you could block your matrices to increase the data granularity at the cost of parallelism. Cheers, Till On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Lydia Ickler <[hidden email]> wrote:
... [show rest of quote] |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |