Hi there,
I recently ran into problems with a Flink job running on an EMR cluster consuming events from a Kinesis stream receiving roughly 15k event/second. Although the EMR cluster was substantially scaled and CPU utilization and system load were well below any alarming threshold, the processing of events of the stream increasingly fell behind. Eventually, it turned out that the SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX defaults to 100 which is apparently causing too much overhead when consuming events from the stream. Increasing the value to 5000, a single GetRecords call to Kinesis can retrieve up to 10k records, made the problem go away. I wonder why the default value for SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX is chosen so low (100x less than it could be). The Kinesis Client Library defaults to 5000 and it's recommended to use this default value: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/streams/latest/dev/troubleshooting-consumers.html#consumer-app-reading-slower. Thanks for the clarification! Cheers, Steffen |
Hi Steffan, I have to admit that I didn’t put too much thoughts in the default values for the Kinesis consumer. In general, we might want to reconsider all the default values for configs related to the getRecords call, i.e. - SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX - SHARD_GETRECORDS_INTERVAL_MILLIS - SHARD_GETRECORDS_BACKOFF_* Cheers, Gordon On March 23, 2017 at 2:12:32 AM, Steffen Hausmann ([hidden email]) wrote:
|
Hi Gordon,
thanks for looking into this and sorry it took me so long to file the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6365. Really appreciate your contributions for the Kinesis connector! Cheers, Steffen On 22/03/2017 20:21, Tzu-Li (Gordon) Tai wrote: > Hi Steffan, > > I have to admit that I didn’t put too much thoughts in the default > values for the Kinesis consumer. > > I’d say it would be reasonable to change the default values to follow > KCL’s settings. Could you file a JIRA for this? > > In general, we might want to reconsider all the default values for > configs related to the getRecords call, i.e. > - SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX > - SHARD_GETRECORDS_INTERVAL_MILLIS > - SHARD_GETRECORDS_BACKOFF_* > > Cheers, > Gordon > > On March 23, 2017 at 2:12:32 AM, Steffen Hausmann > ([hidden email] <mailto:[hidden email]>) wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> I recently ran into problems with a Flink job running on an EMR cluster >> consuming events from a Kinesis stream receiving roughly 15k >> event/second. Although the EMR cluster was substantially scaled and CPU >> utilization and system load were well below any alarming threshold, the >> processing of events of the stream increasingly fell behind. >> >> Eventually, it turned out that the SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX defaults to 100 >> which is apparently causing too much overhead when consuming events from >> the stream. Increasing the value to 5000, a single GetRecords call to >> Kinesis can retrieve up to 10k records, made the problem go away. >> >> I wonder why the default value for SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX is chosen so low >> (100x less than it could be). The Kinesis Client Library defaults to >> 5000 and it's recommended to use this default value: >> http://docs.aws.amazon.com/streams/latest/dev/troubleshooting-consumers.html#consumer-app-reading-slower. >> >> >> Thanks for the clarification! >> >> Cheers, >> Steffen |
Thanks for filing the JIRA! Would you also be up to open a PR to for the change? That would be very very helpful :) Cheers, Gordon
On 24 April 2017 at 3:27:48 AM, Steffen Hausmann ([hidden email]) wrote:
|
Hi Steffen, Thanks for bringing up the discussion! I think the reason why SHARD_GETRECORDS_INTERVAL_MILLIS was defaulted to 0 in the first place was because we didn’t want false impressions that the there was some latency introduced in Flink with the default settings. To this end, I’m leaning towards not touching SHARD_GETRECORDS_INTERVAL_MILLIS. Ideally, the docs in this section [1] should guide the user to tweak this setting if they’re having issues with competing apps also consuming the shards. Could also improve this if you think the notice for this issue needs to be more prominent. However, I do suggest changing SHARD_GETRECORDS_MAX to a higher value. 100 seems to be too small by default. Increasing that should also be safe in the sense that it would not introduce unexpected behavior changes for the user. What do you think? On 23 June 2017 at 4:30:10 AM, Steffen Hausmann ([hidden email]) wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |