Hi,
I'm trying to implement the most efficient way to incrementally put incoming DataStream elements in my (map)state, while removing old elements (older that x) from that same state. I then want to output the state every y seconds. I've looked into using the ProcessFunction with onTimer, or building my own Trigger for a window function, but I struggle with putting all this together in a logical and efficient way. Since the state is very big I don't want to duplicate it over multiple (sliding)windows. Does anybody know the best way to achieve this? Some pseudo code would be very helpful. Thanks! -- Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/ |
Hi
From your description: "output the state every y seconds and remove old elements", I think TTL [1] is the proper solution for your scenario. And you could define the ttl of your state as y seconds so that processfunction could only print elements in the last
y seconds.
Best
Yun Tang
From: Annemarie Burger <[hidden email]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 2:46 To: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Incremental state with purging Hi,
I'm trying to implement the most efficient way to incrementally put incoming DataStream elements in my (map)state, while removing old elements (older that x) from that same state. I then want to output the state every y seconds. I've looked into using the ProcessFunction with onTimer, or building my own Trigger for a window function, but I struggle with putting all this together in a logical and efficient way. Since the state is very big I don't want to duplicate it over multiple (sliding)windows. Does anybody know the best way to achieve this? Some pseudo code would be very helpful. Thanks! -- Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/ |
Hi From your description, you want to do two things: 1 update state and remote the state older than x 2 output the state every y second From my side, the first can be done by using TTL state as Yun said, the second can be done by using KeyedProcessFunction[1] If you want to have complex logic to remove the older state in step 1, maybe you can also use the KeyedProcessFunction and timer() Yun Tang <[hidden email]> 于2020年5月13日周三 下午7:42写道:
|
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions! However, as I'm reading the docs for queryable state, it says that it can only be used for Processing time, and my windows are defined using event time. So, I guess this means I should use the KeyedProcessFunction. Could you maybe suggest a rough implementation for this? I can't seem to get the implementation working right. Best, Annemarie -- Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/ |
I’m wondering that why you use a beta feature for production. Why not push the latest state into down sink like redis or hbase with Apache phoenix .
From: Annemarie Burger <[hidden email]>
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2020 11:19:23 PM To: [hidden email] <[hidden email]> Subject: Re: Incremental state with purging Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions! However, as I'm reading the docs for queryable state, it says that it can only be used for Processing time, and my windows are defined using event time. So, I guess this means I should use the KeyedProcessFunction. Could you maybe suggest a rough implementation for this? I can't seem to get the implementation working right. Best, Annemarie -- Sent from: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |