Hi, I'm following the documentation [1] of window functions with incremental aggregations, but I'm getting an "input mismatch" error. The code [2] is almost identical to the one in the documentation, at the bottom you can find the exact error. What am I missing? Can you provide a working example of a fold function with both a FoldFunction and a WindowFunction? Regards, Matt |
In case this is important, if I remove the WindowFunction, and only use the FoldFunction it works fine. I don't see what is wrong... On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Matt <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Hello Matt,
This looks like a bug in the fold() function to me. I'm adding Timo to the discussion, he can probably shed some light on this. Regards, Chesnay On 12.12.2016 15:13, Matt wrote:
|
Hi Matt, What version of Flink are you using? The incremental agregation with fold(ACC, FoldFunction, WindowFunction) in a new change that will be part of Flink 1.2, for Flink 1.1 the correct way to perform incrementation aggregations is : apply(ACC, FoldFunction, WindowFunction) (see the docs for 1.1 [1]) Best, Yassine 2016-12-12 15:37 GMT+01:00 Chesnay Schepler <[hidden email]>:
|
I'm using 1.2-SNAPSHOT, should it work in that version? On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Yassine MARZOUGUI <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Yes, it was suppoed to work. I looked into this, and as Chesnay said, this is a bug in the fold function. I opened an issue in JIRA : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5320, and will fix it very soon, thank you for reporting it. In the mean time you can workaround the problem by specifying the TypeInformation along with the fold function as follows : fold(ACC, FoldFunction, WindowFunction, foldAccumulatorType, resultType). In the example, the foldAccumulatorType is new TupleTypeInfo<Tuple3<String, Long, Integer>>(), and the resultType is also new TupleTypeInfo<Tuple3<String, Long, Integer>>(). Best, Yassine 2016-12-12 16:38 GMT+01:00 Matt <[hidden email]>:
|
I just checked with version 1.1.3 and it works fine, the problem is that in that version we can't use Kafka 0.10 if I'm not work. Thank you for the workaround! Best, Matt On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Yassine MARZOUGUI <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Err, I meant if I'm not wrong * On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Matt <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |