FlinkCEP, circular references and checkpointing failures

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
22 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FlinkCEP, circular references and checkpointing failures

Stefan Richter
Sure, it is already merged as FLINK-10816.

Best,
Stefan

On 8. Nov 2018, at 11:53, Shailesh Jain <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks a lot for looking into this issue Stefan.

Could you please let me know the issue ID once you open it? It'll help me understand the problem better, and also I could do a quick test in our environment once the issue is resolved.

Thanks,
Shailesh

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, 10:46 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email] wrote:
Really good finding Stefan!

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:28 PM Stefan Richter <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I think I can already spot the problem: LockableTypeSerializer.duplicate() is not properly implemented because it also has to call duplicate() on the element serialiser that is passed into the constructor of the new instance. I will open an issue and fix the problem.

Best,
Stefan

On 7. Nov 2018, at 17:17, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Shailesh,

could you maybe provide us with an example program which is able to reproduce this problem? This would help the community to better debug the problem. It looks not right and might point towards a bug in Flink. Thanks a lot!

Cheers,
Till

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:10 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote:

This is some problem with serializing your events using Kryo. I'm adding Gordon to cc, as he was recently working with serializers. He might give you more insights what is going wrong.

Best,

Dawid

On 25/10/2018 05:41, Shailesh Jain wrote:
Hi Dawid,

I've upgraded to flink 1.6.1 and rebased by changes against the tag 1.6.1, the only commit on top of 1.6 is this: https://github.com/jainshailesh/flink/commit/797e3c4af5b28263fd98fb79daaba97cabf3392c

I ran two separate identical jobs (with and without checkpointing enabled), I'm hitting a ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException (and sometimes NPE) only when checkpointing (HDFS backend) is enabled, with the below stack trace.

I did see a similar problem with different operators here (http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/IndexOutOfBoundsException-on-deserialization-after-updating-to-1-6-1-td23933.html). Is this a known issue which is getting addressed?

Any ideas on what could be causing this?

Thanks,
Shailesh


2018-10-24 17:04:13,365 INFO  org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task                     - SelectCepOperatorMixedTime (1/1) - SelectCepOperatorMixedTime (1/1) (3d984b7919342a3886593401088ca2cd) switched from RUNNING to FAILED.
org.apache.flink.util.FlinkRuntimeException: Failure happened in filter function.
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.createDecisionGraph(NFA.java:731)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.computeNextStates(NFA.java:541)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.doProcess(NFA.java:284)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.process(NFA.java:220)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.operator.AbstractKeyedCEPPatternOperator.processEvent(AbstractKeyedCEPPatternOperator.java:379)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.operator.AbstractKeyedCEPPatternMixedTimeApproachOperator.processElement(AbstractKeyedCEPPatternMixedTimeApproachOperator.java:45)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamInputProcessor.processInput(StreamInputProcessor.java:202)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.OneInputStreamTask.run(OneInputStreamTask.java:105)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:300)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:711)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: org.apache.flink.util.WrappingRuntimeException: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.lambda$materializeMatch$1(SharedBuffer.java:305)
        at java.util.HashMap.computeIfAbsent(HashMap.java:1127)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.materializeMatch(SharedBuffer.java:301)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.materializeMatch(SharedBuffer.java:291)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA$ConditionContext.getEventsForPattern(NFA.java:811)
        at com.stellapps.contrakcep.flink.patterns.critical.AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern$1.filter(AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern.java:70)
        at com.stellapps.contrakcep.flink.patterns.critical.AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern$1.filter(AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern.java:62)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.checkFilterCondition(NFA.java:742)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.createDecisionGraph(NFA.java:716)
        ... 10 more
Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
        at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.util.IntArray.add(IntArray.java:61)
        at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.Kryo.readReferenceOrNull(Kryo.java:800)
        at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.Kryo.readObject(Kryo.java:655)
        at org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.runtime.kryo.KryoSerializer.copy(KryoSerializer.java:231)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.Lockable$LockableTypeSerializer.copy(Lockable.java:120)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.Lockable$LockableTypeSerializer.copy(Lockable.java:95)
        at org.apache.flink.api.common.typeutils.base.MapSerializer.copy(MapSerializer.java:113)
        at org.apache.flink.api.common.typeutils.base.MapSerializer.copy(MapSerializer.java:49)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.CopyOnWriteStateTable.get(CopyOnWriteStateTable.java:287)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.CopyOnWriteStateTable.get(CopyOnWriteStateTable.java:311)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.HeapMapState.get(HeapMapState.java:85)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.UserFacingMapState.get(UserFacingMapState.java:47)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.lambda$materializeMatch$1(SharedBuffer.java:303)
        ... 18 more

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:00 AM Shailesh Jain <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Dawid,

Thanks for your time on this. The diff should have pointed out only the top 3 commits, but since it did not, it is possible I did not rebase my branch against 1.4.2 correctly. I'll check this out and get back to you if I hit the same issue again.

Thanks again,
Shailesh

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:00 PM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Shailesh,

I am afraid it is gonna be hard to help you, as this branch differs significantly from 1.4.2 release (I've done diff across your branch and tag/release-1.4.2). Moreover the code in the branch you've provided still does not correspond to the lines in the exception you've posted previously. Could you check if the problem occurs on vanilla flink as well?

Best,

Dawid


On 27/09/18 08:22, Shailesh Jain wrote:
Hi Dawid,

Yes, it is version 1.4.2. We are running vanilla flink, but have added a couple of changes in the CEP operator specifically (top 3 commits here: https://github.com/jainshailesh/flink/commits/poc_on_1.4.2). Changes I've made to CEP operators do not touch the checkpointing path, just overloading the operator for a specific way of handling event time.

We are hitting this in production, so I'm not sure it'll be feasible to move to 1.6.0 immediately, but eventually yes.

Thanks,
Shailesh

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:44 PM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Shailesh,

Are you sure you are using version 1.4.2? Do you run a vanilla flink, or have you introduced some changes? I am asking cause the lines in stacktrace does not align with the source code for 1.4.2.

Also it is a different exception than the one in the issue you've linked, so if it is a problem than it is definitely a different one. Last thing I would recommend upgrading to the newest version, as we rewritten the SharedBuffer implementation in 1.6.0.

Best,

Dawid


On 26/09/18 13:50, Shailesh Jain wrote:
Hi,

I think I've hit this same issue on a 3 node standalone cluster (1.4.2) using HDFS (2.8.4) as state backend.

2018-09-26 17:07:39,370 INFO  org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task                     - Attempting to fail task externally SelectCepOperator (1/1) (3bec4aa1ef2226c4e0c5ff7b3860d340).
2018-09-26 17:07:39,370 INFO  org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task                     - SelectCepOperator (1/1) (3bec4aa1ef2226c4e0c5ff7b3860d340) switched from RUNNING to FAILED.
AsynchronousException{java.lang.Exception: Could not materialize checkpoint 6 for operator SelectCepOperator (1/1).}
    at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:948)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Could not materialize checkpoint 6 for operator SelectCepOperator (1/1).
    ... 6 more
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
    at org.apache.flink.util.FutureUtil.runIfNotDoneAndGet(FutureUtil.java:43)
    at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:894)
    ... 5 more
    Suppressed: java.lang.Exception: Could not properly cancel managed keyed state future.
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.OperatorSnapshotResult.cancel(OperatorSnapshotResult.java:91)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.cleanup(StreamTask.java:976)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:939)
        ... 5 more
    Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
        at org.apache.flink.util.FutureUtil.runIfNotDoneAndGet(FutureUtil.java:43)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.StateUtil.discardStateFuture(StateUtil.java:66)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.OperatorSnapshotResult.cancel(OperatorSnapshotResult.java:89)
        ... 7 more
    Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.SharedBuffer$SharedBufferSerializer.serialize(SharedBuffer.java:954)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.SharedBuffer$SharedBufferSerializer.serialize(SharedBuffer.java:825)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA$NFASerializer.serialize(NFA.java:888)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA$NFASerializer.serialize(NFA.java:820)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.CopyOnWriteStateTableSnapshot.writeMappingsInKeyGroup(CopyOnWriteStateTableSnapshot.java:196)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.HeapKeyedStateBackend$1.performOperation(HeapKeyedStateBackend.java:390)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.HeapKeyedStateBackend$1.performOperation(HeapKeyedStateBackend.java:339)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.async.AbstractAsyncCallableWithResources.call(AbstractAsyncCallableWithResources.java:75)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
        at org.apache.flink.util.FutureUtil.runIfNotDoneAndGet(FutureUtil.java:40)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:894)
        ... 5 more
    [CIRCULAR REFERENCE:java.lang.NullPointerException]

Any ideas on why I'm hitting this especially when this (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7756) says it has been fixed in 1.4.2 ?

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:34 AM Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thank you very much for your steady response, Kostas!

Cheers,
Federico

2017-11-03 16:26 GMT+01:00 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>:
Hi Federico,

Thanks for trying it out! 
Great to hear that your problem was fixed!

The feature freeze for the release is going to be next week, and I would expect 1 or 2 more weeks testing.
So I would say in 2.5 weeks. But this is of course subject to potential issues we may find during testing.

Cheers,
Kostas

On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Kostas,

I just tried running the same job with 1.4-SNAPSHOT for 10 minutes and it didn't crash, so that was the same underlying issue of the JIRA you linked.

Do you happen to know when it's expected the 1.4 stable release?

Thank you very much,
Federico

2017-11-03 15:25 GMT+01:00 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>:
Perfect! thanks a lot!

Kostas

On Nov 3, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Kostas,

yes, I'm using 1.3.2. I'll try the current master and I'll get back to you.

2017-11-03 15:21 GMT+01:00 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>:
Hi Federico,

I assume that you are using Flink 1.3, right?

In this case, in 1.4 we have fixed a bug that seems similar to your case:

Could you try the current master to see if it fixes your problem?

Thanks,
Kostas

On Nov 3, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:

 Could not find id for entry:                                                        




--
Federico D'Ambrosio




--
Federico D'Ambrosio




--
Federico D'Ambrosio




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: FlinkCEP, circular references and checkpointing failures

Shailesh Jain
Thank you, Stefan. Any ideas on when can we expect 1.6.3 release?

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:28 PM Stefan Richter <[hidden email]> wrote:
Sure, it is already merged as FLINK-10816.

Best,
Stefan

On 8. Nov 2018, at 11:53, Shailesh Jain <[hidden email]> wrote:

Thanks a lot for looking into this issue Stefan.

Could you please let me know the issue ID once you open it? It'll help me understand the problem better, and also I could do a quick test in our environment once the issue is resolved.

Thanks,
Shailesh

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018, 10:46 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email] wrote:
Really good finding Stefan!

On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 5:28 PM Stefan Richter <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I think I can already spot the problem: LockableTypeSerializer.duplicate() is not properly implemented because it also has to call duplicate() on the element serialiser that is passed into the constructor of the new instance. I will open an issue and fix the problem.

Best,
Stefan

On 7. Nov 2018, at 17:17, Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Shailesh,

could you maybe provide us with an example program which is able to reproduce this problem? This would help the community to better debug the problem. It looks not right and might point towards a bug in Flink. Thanks a lot!

Cheers,
Till

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 9:10 AM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote:

This is some problem with serializing your events using Kryo. I'm adding Gordon to cc, as he was recently working with serializers. He might give you more insights what is going wrong.

Best,

Dawid

On 25/10/2018 05:41, Shailesh Jain wrote:
Hi Dawid,

I've upgraded to flink 1.6.1 and rebased by changes against the tag 1.6.1, the only commit on top of 1.6 is this: https://github.com/jainshailesh/flink/commit/797e3c4af5b28263fd98fb79daaba97cabf3392c

I ran two separate identical jobs (with and without checkpointing enabled), I'm hitting a ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException (and sometimes NPE) only when checkpointing (HDFS backend) is enabled, with the below stack trace.

I did see a similar problem with different operators here (http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/IndexOutOfBoundsException-on-deserialization-after-updating-to-1-6-1-td23933.html). Is this a known issue which is getting addressed?

Any ideas on what could be causing this?

Thanks,
Shailesh


2018-10-24 17:04:13,365 INFO  org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task                     - SelectCepOperatorMixedTime (1/1) - SelectCepOperatorMixedTime (1/1) (3d984b7919342a3886593401088ca2cd) switched from RUNNING to FAILED.
org.apache.flink.util.FlinkRuntimeException: Failure happened in filter function.
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.createDecisionGraph(NFA.java:731)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.computeNextStates(NFA.java:541)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.doProcess(NFA.java:284)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.process(NFA.java:220)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.operator.AbstractKeyedCEPPatternOperator.processEvent(AbstractKeyedCEPPatternOperator.java:379)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.operator.AbstractKeyedCEPPatternMixedTimeApproachOperator.processElement(AbstractKeyedCEPPatternMixedTimeApproachOperator.java:45)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.io.StreamInputProcessor.processInput(StreamInputProcessor.java:202)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.OneInputStreamTask.run(OneInputStreamTask.java:105)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask.invoke(StreamTask.java:300)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task.run(Task.java:711)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: org.apache.flink.util.WrappingRuntimeException: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.lambda$materializeMatch$1(SharedBuffer.java:305)
        at java.util.HashMap.computeIfAbsent(HashMap.java:1127)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.materializeMatch(SharedBuffer.java:301)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.materializeMatch(SharedBuffer.java:291)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA$ConditionContext.getEventsForPattern(NFA.java:811)
        at com.stellapps.contrakcep.flink.patterns.critical.AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern$1.filter(AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern.java:70)
        at com.stellapps.contrakcep.flink.patterns.critical.AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern$1.filter(AgitatorMalfunctionAfterChillingPattern.java:62)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.checkFilterCondition(NFA.java:742)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA.createDecisionGraph(NFA.java:716)
        ... 10 more
Caused by: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: -1
        at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.util.IntArray.add(IntArray.java:61)
        at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.Kryo.readReferenceOrNull(Kryo.java:800)
        at com.esotericsoftware.kryo.Kryo.readObject(Kryo.java:655)
        at org.apache.flink.api.java.typeutils.runtime.kryo.KryoSerializer.copy(KryoSerializer.java:231)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.Lockable$LockableTypeSerializer.copy(Lockable.java:120)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.Lockable$LockableTypeSerializer.copy(Lockable.java:95)
        at org.apache.flink.api.common.typeutils.base.MapSerializer.copy(MapSerializer.java:113)
        at org.apache.flink.api.common.typeutils.base.MapSerializer.copy(MapSerializer.java:49)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.CopyOnWriteStateTable.get(CopyOnWriteStateTable.java:287)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.CopyOnWriteStateTable.get(CopyOnWriteStateTable.java:311)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.HeapMapState.get(HeapMapState.java:85)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.UserFacingMapState.get(UserFacingMapState.java:47)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.sharedbuffer.SharedBuffer.lambda$materializeMatch$1(SharedBuffer.java:303)
        ... 18 more

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 11:00 AM Shailesh Jain <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Dawid,

Thanks for your time on this. The diff should have pointed out only the top 3 commits, but since it did not, it is possible I did not rebase my branch against 1.4.2 correctly. I'll check this out and get back to you if I hit the same issue again.

Thanks again,
Shailesh

On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 1:00 PM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Shailesh,

I am afraid it is gonna be hard to help you, as this branch differs significantly from 1.4.2 release (I've done diff across your branch and tag/release-1.4.2). Moreover the code in the branch you've provided still does not correspond to the lines in the exception you've posted previously. Could you check if the problem occurs on vanilla flink as well?

Best,

Dawid


On 27/09/18 08:22, Shailesh Jain wrote:
Hi Dawid,

Yes, it is version 1.4.2. We are running vanilla flink, but have added a couple of changes in the CEP operator specifically (top 3 commits here: https://github.com/jainshailesh/flink/commits/poc_on_1.4.2). Changes I've made to CEP operators do not touch the checkpointing path, just overloading the operator for a specific way of handling event time.

We are hitting this in production, so I'm not sure it'll be feasible to move to 1.6.0 immediately, but eventually yes.

Thanks,
Shailesh

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 5:44 PM Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Shailesh,

Are you sure you are using version 1.4.2? Do you run a vanilla flink, or have you introduced some changes? I am asking cause the lines in stacktrace does not align with the source code for 1.4.2.

Also it is a different exception than the one in the issue you've linked, so if it is a problem than it is definitely a different one. Last thing I would recommend upgrading to the newest version, as we rewritten the SharedBuffer implementation in 1.6.0.

Best,

Dawid


On 26/09/18 13:50, Shailesh Jain wrote:
Hi,

I think I've hit this same issue on a 3 node standalone cluster (1.4.2) using HDFS (2.8.4) as state backend.

2018-09-26 17:07:39,370 INFO  org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task                     - Attempting to fail task externally SelectCepOperator (1/1) (3bec4aa1ef2226c4e0c5ff7b3860d340).
2018-09-26 17:07:39,370 INFO  org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task                     - SelectCepOperator (1/1) (3bec4aa1ef2226c4e0c5ff7b3860d340) switched from RUNNING to FAILED.
AsynchronousException{java.lang.Exception: Could not materialize checkpoint 6 for operator SelectCepOperator (1/1).}
    at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:948)
    at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
    at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
Caused by: java.lang.Exception: Could not materialize checkpoint 6 for operator SelectCepOperator (1/1).
    ... 6 more
Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
    at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
    at org.apache.flink.util.FutureUtil.runIfNotDoneAndGet(FutureUtil.java:43)
    at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:894)
    ... 5 more
    Suppressed: java.lang.Exception: Could not properly cancel managed keyed state future.
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.OperatorSnapshotResult.cancel(OperatorSnapshotResult.java:91)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.cleanup(StreamTask.java:976)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:939)
        ... 5 more
    Caused by: java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.report(FutureTask.java:122)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.get(FutureTask.java:192)
        at org.apache.flink.util.FutureUtil.runIfNotDoneAndGet(FutureUtil.java:43)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.StateUtil.discardStateFuture(StateUtil.java:66)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.api.operators.OperatorSnapshotResult.cancel(OperatorSnapshotResult.java:89)
        ... 7 more
    Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.SharedBuffer$SharedBufferSerializer.serialize(SharedBuffer.java:954)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.SharedBuffer$SharedBufferSerializer.serialize(SharedBuffer.java:825)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA$NFASerializer.serialize(NFA.java:888)
        at org.apache.flink.cep.nfa.NFA$NFASerializer.serialize(NFA.java:820)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.CopyOnWriteStateTableSnapshot.writeMappingsInKeyGroup(CopyOnWriteStateTableSnapshot.java:196)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.HeapKeyedStateBackend$1.performOperation(HeapKeyedStateBackend.java:390)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.state.heap.HeapKeyedStateBackend$1.performOperation(HeapKeyedStateBackend.java:339)
        at org.apache.flink.runtime.io.async.AbstractAsyncCallableWithResources.call(AbstractAsyncCallableWithResources.java:75)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
        at org.apache.flink.util.FutureUtil.runIfNotDoneAndGet(FutureUtil.java:40)
        at org.apache.flink.streaming.runtime.tasks.StreamTask$AsyncCheckpointRunnable.run(StreamTask.java:894)
        ... 5 more
    [CIRCULAR REFERENCE:java.lang.NullPointerException]

Any ideas on why I'm hitting this especially when this (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7756) says it has been fixed in 1.4.2 ?

On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 12:34 AM Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:
Thank you very much for your steady response, Kostas!

Cheers,
Federico

2017-11-03 16:26 GMT+01:00 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>:
Hi Federico,

Thanks for trying it out! 
Great to hear that your problem was fixed!

The feature freeze for the release is going to be next week, and I would expect 1 or 2 more weeks testing.
So I would say in 2.5 weeks. But this is of course subject to potential issues we may find during testing.

Cheers,
Kostas

On Nov 3, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Kostas,

I just tried running the same job with 1.4-SNAPSHOT for 10 minutes and it didn't crash, so that was the same underlying issue of the JIRA you linked.

Do you happen to know when it's expected the 1.4 stable release?

Thank you very much,
Federico

2017-11-03 15:25 GMT+01:00 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>:
Perfect! thanks a lot!

Kostas

On Nov 3, 2017, at 3:23 PM, Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Kostas,

yes, I'm using 1.3.2. I'll try the current master and I'll get back to you.

2017-11-03 15:21 GMT+01:00 Kostas Kloudas <[hidden email]>:
Hi Federico,

I assume that you are using Flink 1.3, right?

In this case, in 1.4 we have fixed a bug that seems similar to your case:

Could you try the current master to see if it fixes your problem?

Thanks,
Kostas

On Nov 3, 2017, at 3:12 PM, Federico D'Ambrosio <[hidden email]> wrote:

 Could not find id for entry:                                                        




--
Federico D'Ambrosio




--
Federico D'Ambrosio




--
Federico D'Ambrosio




12