ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Flavio Pompermaier
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Stephan Ewen
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Flavio Pompermaier
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Flavio Pompermaier
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Stephan Ewen
We can think about that, but I think it may be quite confusing. The configurations actually mean something different for local and remote environments:

  - For the local environment, the config basically describes the entire Flink cluster setup (for the local execution cluster in the background)
  - For the remote environment, the config describes the parameters for the client that connects to the cluster (akka paramters, optimizer parameters, ...), but not parameters of the cluster itself (like taskmanager slots and memory).

Greetings,
Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio




Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Flavio Pompermaier
That makes sense: what can be configured should be differentiated between local and remote envs (obviously this is a minor issue/improvement)

Thanks again,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
We can think about that, but I think it may be quite confusing. The configurations actually mean something different for local and remote environments:

  - For the local environment, the config basically describes the entire Flink cluster setup (for the local execution cluster in the background)
  - For the remote environment, the config describes the parameters for the client that connects to the cluster (akka paramters, optimizer parameters, ...), but not parameters of the cluster itself (like taskmanager slots and memory).

Greetings,
Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio





Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Flavio Pompermaier
Hi Fabian and Stephan, back to work :)

I finally managed to find the problem of the parallelism encountered by my colleague!
Basically that was introduced by this API change. Before I was using env.setConfiguration() to merge the default params with some custom ones.
Now, after the API change I was using the following code:

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
if (env instanceof LocalEnvironment) {
Configuration c = new Configuration();
c.setString(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY, FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setString(ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY,FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY, 2048 * 2);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NUM_TASK_SLOTS, 4);
env = ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(c);
}

However, the first env and the reassigned one doesn't behave in the same manner.
If I don't reassign env I have parallelism=8, otherwise it's 1 :(
Am I using the wrong APIs or the execution environment doesn't allow now to configure such parameters anymore?

Thanks in advance,
Flavio


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
That makes sense: what can be configured should be differentiated between local and remote envs (obviously this is a minor issue/improvement)

Thanks again,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
We can think about that, but I think it may be quite confusing. The configurations actually mean something different for local and remote environments:

  - For the local environment, the config basically describes the entire Flink cluster setup (for the local execution cluster in the background)
  - For the remote environment, the config describes the parameters for the client that connects to the cluster (akka paramters, optimizer parameters, ...), but not parameters of the cluster itself (like taskmanager slots and memory).

Greetings,
Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio






Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Stephan Ewen
Hi Flavio!

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment() by default picks up the number of cores as the parallelism, while the manual environments do not do that.
You can still set it manually set the parallelism "env.setParallelism(Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors());"

I would not configure the slots for the local execution, they should be automatically configured based on the max parallelism.

Greetings,
Stephan


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Fabian and Stephan, back to work :)

I finally managed to find the problem of the parallelism encountered by my colleague!
Basically that was introduced by this API change. Before I was using env.setConfiguration() to merge the default params with some custom ones.
Now, after the API change I was using the following code:

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
if (env instanceof LocalEnvironment) {
Configuration c = new Configuration();
c.setString(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY, FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setString(ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY,FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY, 2048 * 2);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NUM_TASK_SLOTS, 4);
env = ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(c);
}

However, the first env and the reassigned one doesn't behave in the same manner.
If I don't reassign env I have parallelism=8, otherwise it's 1 :(
Am I using the wrong APIs or the execution environment doesn't allow now to configure such parameters anymore?

Thanks in advance,
Flavio


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
That makes sense: what can be configured should be differentiated between local and remote envs (obviously this is a minor issue/improvement)

Thanks again,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
We can think about that, but I think it may be quite confusing. The configurations actually mean something different for local and remote environments:

  - For the local environment, the config basically describes the entire Flink cluster setup (for the local execution cluster in the background)
  - For the remote environment, the config describes the parameters for the client that connects to the cluster (akka paramters, optimizer parameters, ...), but not parameters of the cluster itself (like taskmanager slots and memory).

Greetings,
Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio







Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Flavio Pompermaier

of course,I tried to configure the task slot during a debug test and I forgot to remove it..
Just for curiosity, is there any good reason why you've changed the default parallellelism that way?and moreover, is it the only unexpected changed behaviour wrt the previous API version?

On 14 Oct 2015 18:35, "Stephan Ewen" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Flavio!

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment() by default picks up the number of cores as the parallelism, while the manual environments do not do that.
You can still set it manually set the parallelism "env.setParallelism(Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors());"

I would not configure the slots for the local execution, they should be automatically configured based on the max parallelism.

Greetings,
Stephan


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Fabian and Stephan, back to work :)

I finally managed to find the problem of the parallelism encountered by my colleague!
Basically that was introduced by this API change. Before I was using env.setConfiguration() to merge the default params with some custom ones.
Now, after the API change I was using the following code:

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
if (env instanceof LocalEnvironment) {
Configuration c = new Configuration();
c.setString(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY, FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setString(ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY,FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY, 2048 * 2);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NUM_TASK_SLOTS, 4);
env = ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(c);
}

However, the first env and the reassigned one doesn't behave in the same manner.
If I don't reassign env I have parallelism=8, otherwise it's 1 :(
Am I using the wrong APIs or the execution environment doesn't allow now to configure such parameters anymore?

Thanks in advance,
Flavio


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
That makes sense: what can be configured should be differentiated between local and remote envs (obviously this is a minor issue/improvement)

Thanks again,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
We can think about that, but I think it may be quite confusing. The configurations actually mean something different for local and remote environments:

  - For the local environment, the config basically describes the entire Flink cluster setup (for the local execution cluster in the background)
  - For the remote environment, the config describes the parameters for the client that connects to the cluster (akka paramters, optimizer parameters, ...), but not parameters of the cluster itself (like taskmanager slots and memory).

Greetings,
Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,

today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio







Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: ExecutionEnvironment setConfiguration API

Fabian Hueske-2
I think it's not a nice solution to check for the type of the returned execution environment to determine whether it is a local or a remote execution environment.

Wouldn't it be better to add a method isLocal() to ExecutionEnvironment?

Cheers, Fabian

2015-10-14 19:14 GMT+02:00 Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]>:

of course,I tried to configure the task slot during a debug test and I forgot to remove it..
Just for curiosity, is there any good reason why you've changed the default parallellelism that way?and moreover, is it the only unexpected changed behaviour wrt the previous API version?

On 14 Oct 2015 18:35, "Stephan Ewen" <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Flavio!

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment() by default picks up the number of cores as the parallelism, while the manual environments do not do that.
You can still set it manually set the parallelism "env.setParallelism(Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors());"

I would not configure the slots for the local execution, they should be automatically configured based on the max parallelism.

Greetings,
Stephan


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi Fabian and Stephan, back to work :)

I finally managed to find the problem of the parallelism encountered by my colleague!
Basically that was introduced by this API change. Before I was using env.setConfiguration() to merge the default params with some custom ones.
Now, after the API change I was using the following code:

ExecutionEnvironment env = ExecutionEnvironment.getExecutionEnvironment();
if (env instanceof LocalEnvironment) {
Configuration c = new Configuration();
c.setString(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY, FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setString(ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY,FLINK_TEST_TMP_DIR);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY, 2048 * 2);
c.setLong(ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NUM_TASK_SLOTS, 4);
env = ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(c);
}

However, the first env and the reassigned one doesn't behave in the same manner.
If I don't reassign env I have parallelism=8, otherwise it's 1 :(
Am I using the wrong APIs or the execution environment doesn't allow now to configure such parameters anymore?

Thanks in advance,
Flavio


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
That makes sense: what can be configured should be differentiated between local and remote envs (obviously this is a minor issue/improvement)

Thanks again,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
We can think about that, but I think it may be quite confusing. The configurations actually mean something different for local and remote environments:

  - For the local environment, the config basically describes the entire Flink cluster setup (for the local execution cluster in the background)
  - For the remote environment, the config describes the parameters for the client that connects to the cluster (akka paramters, optimizer parameters, ...), but not parameters of the cluster itself (like taskmanager slots and memory).

Greetings,
Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
However it could be a good idea to overload also the getExecutionEnvironment() to be able to pass a custom configuration..what do you think?
Otherwise I have to know a priori if I'm working in a local deployment or in a remote one, or check if getExecutionEnvironment() returned an instance of LocalEnvironment/RemoteEnvironment..



On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Yes Stephan!
I usually work with the master version, at least in development ;)
Thanks for the quick support!

Best,
Flavio

On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi!

Are you on the SNAPSHOT master version?

You can pass the configuration to the constructor of the execution environment, or create one via ExecutionEnvironment.createLocalEnvironment(config) or via createRemoteEnvironment(host, port, configuration, jarFiles);

The change of the signature was part of an API cleanup for the next release. Sorry for the inconvenience...

Stephan


On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi to all,
today my code doesn't compile anymore because ExecutionEnvironment doesn't have setConfiguration() anymore..how can I set the following parameters in my unit tests?

- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_TMP_DIR_KEY
- ConfigConstants.BLOB_STORAGE_DIRECTORY_KEY
- ConfigConstants.TASK_MANAGER_NETWORK_NUM_BUFFERS_KEY

Best,
Flavio