Hi, Sagar Thank your for your review. I will fix it when available.
Ans: Yes. I will add more unit tests in there.
Ans: Yes. Since I have been busy these days. After a couple of days, I will add the rest data type. And give more tests for that. Cheers Zhangminglei
|
In reply to this post by Stephan Ewen
Hi, Community By the way, there is a very important feature I think it should be. Currently, the BucketingSink does not support when a bucket is ready for user use. This situation will be very obvious when flink work with offline end. We called that real time/offline integration in business. In this case, we should let the user can do some extra work when the bucket is ready. And here is the JIRA for this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9609 Cheers Minglei
|
Hi all! A late follow-up with some thoughts: In principle, all these are good suggestions and are on the roadmap. We are trying to make the release "by time", meaning for it at a certain date (roughly in two weeks) and take what features are ready into the release. Looking at the status of the features that you suggested (please take this with a grain of salt, I don't know the status of all issues perfectly): - Proper sliding window joins: This is happening, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8478 At least inner joins will most likely make it into 1.6. Related to that is enrichment joins against time versioned tables, which are being worked on in the Table API: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9712 - Bucketing Sink on S3 and ORC / Parquet Support: There are multiple efforts happening here. The biggest one is that the bucketing sink is getting a complete overhaul to support all of the mentioned features, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9749 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9752 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9753 Hard to say how much will make it until the feature freeze of 1.6, but this is happening and will be merged soon. - ElasticBloomFilters: Quite a big feature, I added a reply to the discussion thread, looking at whether this can be realized in a more loosely coupled way from the core state abstraction. - Per partition Watermark idleness: Noted, let's look at this more. There should also be a way to implement this today, with periodic watermarks (that realize when no records came for a while). - Dynamic CEP patterns: I don't know if anyone if working on this. CEP is getting some love at the moment, though, with SQL integration and better performance on RocksDB for larger patterns. We'll take a note that there are various requests for dynamic patterns. - Kubernetes Integration: There are some developments going on both for a "passive" k8s integration (jobs as docker images, Flink beine a transparent k8s citizen) and a more "active" integration, where Flink directly talks to k8s to start TaskManagers dynamically. I think the former has a good chance that a first version goes into 1.6, the latter needs more work. - Atomic Cancel With Savepoint: Not enough progress on this, yet. It is important, but needs more work. - Synchronizing streams: Same as above, acknowledged that this is important, but needs more work. - Standalone cluster job isolation: No work on this, yet, as far as I know. - Sharing state across operators: This is an interesting and tricky one, I left some questions on the JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6239 Best, Stephan On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:45 AM, zhangminglei <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
I am not sure whether this is in any roadmap and as someone suggested wishes are free...Tensorflow on flink though ambitious should be a big win. I am not sure how operator isolation for a hybrid GPU/CPU would be achieved and how repetitive execution could be natively supported by flink but it seems that if as a developer looking at flink as filling the ML void that has emerged and thus being forced to chose between spark and flink some futuristic announcement in the ML space is required and tensorflow is that one marquee project that everyone wants to get a handle on.... On Wed, Jul 4, 2018, 5:10 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |