Hi all!
For some cleanup and simplifications, it would be helpful to drop Savepoint compatibility with Flink version 1.2. That version was released almost three years ago. I would expect that no one uses that old version any more in a way that they actively want to upgrade directly to 1.11. Even if, there is still the way to first upgrade to another version (like 1.9) and then upgrade to 1.11 from there. Any concerns to drop that support? Best, Stephan |
+1 for dropping compatibility. I personally think that it is very important for a project to keep a good pace in developing that old legacy stuff must be dropped from time to time. As long as there is an upgrade routine (via going to another flink release) that's fine. Von: "Stephan Ewen" <[hidden email]> An: "dev" <[hidden email]>, "user" <[hidden email]> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2020 11:11:43 Betreff: [DISCUSS] Drop Savepoint Compatibility with Flink 1.2 Hi all! For some cleanup and simplifications, it would be helpful to drop Savepoint compatibility with Flink version 1.2. That version was released almost three years ago. I would expect that no one uses that old version any more in a way that they actively want to upgrade directly to 1.11. Even if, there is still the way to first upgrade to another version (like 1.9) and then upgrade to 1.11 from there. Any concerns to drop that support? Best, Stephan -- SCOOP Software GmbH - Gut Maarhausen - Eiler Straße 3 P - D-51107 Köln Theo Diefenthal T +49 221 801916-196 - F +49 221 801916-17 - M +49 160 90506575 [hidden email] - www.scoop-software.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln, Handelsregister: Köln, Handelsregisternummer: HRB 36625 Geschäftsführung: Dr. Oleg Balovnev, Frank Heinen, Martin Müller-Rohde, Dr. Wolfgang Reddig, Roland Scheel |
+1 for dropping Savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2 Flink 1.2 is quite far away from the latest 1.10. Especially after the release of Flink 1.9 and 1.10, the code and architecture have undergone major changes. Currently, I am updating state migration tests for Flink 1.10. I can still see some binary snapshot files of version 1.2. If we agree on this topic, we may be able to alleviate some of the burdens(remove those binary files) when the migration tests would be updated later. Best, Vino Theo Diefenthal <[hidden email]> 于2020年2月20日周四 下午9:04写道:
|
Thank you for the feedback. Here is the JIRA issue with some more explanation also about the background and implications: Best, Stephan On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:26 PM vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
+1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. Cheers, Till On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
Hey Stephan,
+1. Reading over the linked ticket and your description here, I think it makes a lot of sense to go ahead with this. Since it's possible to upgrade via intermediate Flink releases as a fail-safe I don't have any concerns. – Ufuk On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:34 PM Till Rohrmann <[hidden email]> wrote: > > +1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. > > Cheers, > Till > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 6:55 PM Stephan Ewen <[hidden email]> wrote: >> >> Thank you for the feedback. >> >> Here is the JIRA issue with some more explanation also about the background and implications: >> https://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-16192 >> >> Best, >> Stephan >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 2:26 PM vino yang <[hidden email]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 for dropping Savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2 >>> >>> Flink 1.2 is quite far away from the latest 1.10. Especially after the release of Flink 1.9 and 1.10, the code and architecture have undergone major changes. >>> >>> Currently, I am updating state migration tests for Flink 1.10. I can still see some binary snapshot files of version 1.2. If we agree on this topic, we may be able to alleviate some of the burdens(remove those binary files) when the migration tests would be updated later. >>> >>> Best, >>> Vino >>> >>> Theo Diefenthal <[hidden email]> 于2020年2月20日周四 下午9:04写道: >>>> >>>> +1 for dropping compatibility. >>>> >>>> I personally think that it is very important for a project to keep a good pace in developing that old legacy stuff must be dropped from time to time. As long as there is an upgrade routine (via going to another flink release) that's fine. >>>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> Von: "Stephan Ewen" <[hidden email]> >>>> An: "dev" <[hidden email]>, "user" <[hidden email]> >>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Februar 2020 11:11:43 >>>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] Drop Savepoint Compatibility with Flink 1.2 >>>> >>>> Hi all! >>>> For some cleanup and simplifications, it would be helpful to drop Savepoint compatibility with Flink version 1.2. That version was released almost three years ago. >>>> >>>> I would expect that no one uses that old version any more in a way that they actively want to upgrade directly to 1.11. >>>> >>>> Even if, there is still the way to first upgrade to another version (like 1.9) and then upgrade to 1.11 from there. >>>> >>>> Any concerns to drop that support? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Stephan >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> SCOOP Software GmbH - Gut Maarhausen - Eiler Straße 3 P - D-51107 Köln >>>> Theo Diefenthal >>>> >>>> T +49 221 801916-196 - F +49 221 801916-17 - M +49 160 90506575 >>>> [hidden email] - www.scoop-software.de >>>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Köln, Handelsregister: Köln, >>>> Handelsregisternummer: HRB 36625 >>>> Geschäftsführung: Dr. Oleg Balovnev, Frank Heinen, >>>> Martin Müller-Rohde, Dr. Wolfgang Reddig, Roland Scheel |
+1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2. Best Regards,
Yu On Sat, 22 Feb 2020 at 22:05, Ufuk Celebi <[hidden email]> wrote:
|
+1 for dropping Best, Dawid On 24/02/2020 08:22, Yu Li wrote:
signature.asc (849 bytes) Download Attachment |
+1 for dropping savepoint compatibility with Flink 1.2 Best, Congxian Dawid Wysakowicz <[hidden email]> 于2020年2月24日周一 下午4:00写道:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |